For decades, economists have studied and debated how much, if any, impact the President actually has on the US economy. The 2018 GDP figures are set to be released later this week. With the economy on strong footing, it is likely Donald Trump will offer his own answer to this question. Taking credit for the country’s economic health.

Public mindset often conflates the role of the presidency with managing the national economy, and candidates spend hours on the campaign trail dropping buzzwords like “jobs” and “unemployment” with little regard for the actual power of their office to significantly alter these figures.

The President and the Economy

The president plays a very limited role in affecting the Country’s macroeconomic health. Studies show that the president may not be a major economic actor. Yet the president’s party affiliation is a strong predictor of future economic health.

The US economy fares much better under a Democratic White House regardless of what metric performance is measured by.

GDP growth is the standard measurement of economic health. Annualized real GDP growth in the US averaged 3.33%: 4.33% under Democrats and 2.54% under Republicans.

This means that over a 4-year presidency, the size of the US economy grows by an additional 7.16% on average, if a Democrat is in the White House.

This 1.79% annual spread is called the D-R gap. Which is strikingly large when speaking in terms of GDP growth in an economy as advanced as the US’.

Explaining the Gap

Blinder and Watson attribute most of this performance gap to a handful of phenomena. Including oil shocks, defense spending, productivity shocks, foreign economic growth, and consumer expectations. Surprisingly, they do not believe fiscal or monetary policy play a significant role in explaining the gap.

“Jobs” and “unemployment”, consistently rank among the most important issues for US voters. The difference between unemployment rates under Democratic and Republican administrations is not significant. There is a large difference in the change of the unemployment rate. Under Democrats, the unemployment rate fell by 0.8%, while under Republicans, it rose by 1.1% on average.

Since Trump took office, the unemployment rate has fallen by 0.7% and currently hovers around 4.1%. So, there are technically more jobs under Trump, but whether he has done anything to create them is up for debate. Many analyst believe Obama-era policies have positively impacted the American economy.

This argument seems to make sense, as Trump has struggled to pass legislation that would significantly alter economic indicators since he entered office.

What can the President do?

While Trump may not have put in place the foundations for a healthy US economy, he nonetheless presides over one. And when a president promises “corporate tax cuts” and “deregulation” in an already good economy, investor optimism soars, effectively resulting in the juicing up of the stock market.

The stock market is what economists call a leading indicator. Performance can be used to predict what will happen to the economy at large shortly thereafter. For example, just before the financial crisis of 2008 brought the US economy to its knees, the Dow (DJI) plummeted.

Trump has been effective in pushing up the levels of major stock indices before the passage of the Republican tax plan. This was done by signaling to investors and companies that conditions will be more favorable to them in the future. However, the stock market does not necessarily reflect the robust health of the US economy or the welfare of the average American, as most Americans don’t own any stock.

Nor do stock market gains offset the country’s national debt, despite what the President himself may believe. While Wall Street and corporate America generally support Republicans, and Trump promised big wins for big business, historically, corporate profit share of GDI (gross domestic income) is greater under Democrats.

“Although business votes Republican, it prospers more under Democrats.”

Economic Trade-Offs

While it may take some time for the impact of Trump’s economic policies to become apparent, the effects of Trump’s hostility toward free-trade in his dealings with the international community materialized almost immediately.

Trump’s antiquated trade policies are not as relevant to the macroeconomy as he may have thought. In reality, the global economy does not believe in America First. It is void of national allegiance.

Regardless of who is in the White House, the average American doesn’t want to pay $1500 for a phone or $50 for a t-shirt. Businesses will continue sourcing these products from manufacturers in China and Bangladesh to meet this price point.

In today’s highly globalized economy, levying tariffs in a global order increasingly dominated by free-trade partnerships is much more akin to shooting yourself in the foot right before the beginning of a race than it is to safeguarding your population from changes in the modern economy.

Trump’s trade policies signal a shift away from our country’s previous stance on free trade. The US’ absence in international trade partnerships will be filled by other willing participants.

Countries like Australia and Canada have capitalized on the US’ withdrawal from TPP by taking significant market share from US beef producers. Meanwhile, China continues to undermine American soft power and is playing an increasingly instrumental role in fostering trade agreements with other countries. The losers? American producers.




Trump’s trade policies may be an anachronism, but in all, the fundamentals underlying the US economy are strong.

Employment rates, the consumer confidence index, and the stock market are all hitting record highs. But we know from experience this rally can’t last forever.

While the robust health of the US economy will likely mask underlying risk factors in the short term, the rapid growth of asset and stock prices, coupled with huge corporate tax cuts and deregulation will likely contribute to an eventual overheating of US markets. At this point, which is notoriously difficult to figure out beforehand, a market readjustment will likely take place. Advice?

Keep your eyes on the Fed. By surrounding yourself with a greater understanding of the markets, you can continue to step closer to financial fluency.

In case you missed it, check out our recent post highlighting weed stocks.

Download the Rapunzl App & Invest For Free or learn more at our website

rapunzl investing app appstore button
Rapunzl investing app for android
Share This Post